Top-Down Contingencies in Peripheral Cuing
- Autor(en)
- Ulrich Ansorge, Manfred Heumann
- Abstrakt
According to contingent-processing accounts, peripheral cuing effects are due to the cues' inadvertent selection for processing by control settings set up for targets (e.g., C. L. Folk, R. W. Remington, & J. C. Johnston, 1992). Consequently, cues similar to targets should have stronger effects than do dissimilar cues. In the current study, this prediction is confirmed for cue-target combinations similar or dissimilar in the static features of color (Experiments 1-3) and location (Experiment 4), even when both cues and targets share the dynamic feature of abrupt onset. Perceptual priming (Experiment 2) and reallocation of attention did not account for similar-dissimilar differences (Experiments 3 and 4). The results are best explained by top-down-contingent attentional effects of the similar cues. Implications for bottom-up accounts of peripheral cuing effects are discussed.
- Organisation(en)
- Institut für Psychologie der Kognition, Emotion und Methoden
- Externe Organisation(en)
- Universität Bielefeld
- Journal
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Band
- 29
- Seiten
- 937-948
- Anzahl der Seiten
- 12
- ISSN
- 0096-1523
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.937
- Publikationsdatum
- 10-2003
- Peer-reviewed
- Ja
- ÖFOS 2012
- 501006 Experimentalpsychologie, 501011 Kognitionspsychologie
- ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), Behavioral Neuroscience
- Link zum Portal
- https://ucris.univie.ac.at/portal/de/publications/topdown-contingencies-in-peripheral-cuing(60ebca94-c5ff-48fc-8357-3daa69457159).html